*UPDATED
Also, transformation starter activity:
and answers:
Subtext: the story introduction is something I've put in because one of my goals this year has been lesson personalisation. Its something that has paid off great dividends in terms of my relationship with many of the pupils.
Also, storytelling is supposedly hard-wired in to all humans, which means that the problem is framed in a relatable and memorable manor, even if the pupils are not capable of relating to the algebra on the horizon. Its optional because it may not suit your style or there may be classes who may just get confused/distracted with the extra detail.
The problem is posed simply and honestly. There are no 'write an equation' or other scary sentences, and it feels like this is information that you would readily be able to get from each internet café.
By the way: to make the problem more applicable to internet cafés I would change the <per hour> in to <per 10 minute slot>.
Subtext: In the original problem, part d is a significant step down the ladder of abstraction and is much easier to solve than a-c. I've switched it around, going from specific cases to the general equations.
I've added my way of scaffolding writing equations (where you write down what calculation you are doing in words first). I've found it really helps pupils to connect algebra to what it actually means.
You could also have a 'take a guess when they will cost the same' section before moving between the specific and general case. This may improve motivation for the general case, but in this case pupils may feel its easier to use trial and improvement (thus demotivating the need for the general case).
Subtext: You have to be careful here that the similar questions are not so similar that they become mindless. I like the duelling discounts and the toaster regression for this as it is not immediately obvious that the same technique would be applicable here. One of the 'big ideas' I would like my pupils to learn about maths is the portability of problem solving techniques in to different types of problem.
I used the classic extension method of reversing the question here. Offering a problem with messy numbers or without perfect correlation is another portable extension tool I often use.
"What sizes of square is it possible to make (below 25)?"When you look at the possible areas, you can see how they can all be made by adding two squares together and hopefully this will help bridge that leap in to the general case.
Possible areas: 2, 5, 8, 10, 13, 17, 18, 20, 25
http://www.fotopedia.com/items/josegoulao-TbuZScZeYnM |
This post was inspired by an episode of the Craig Barton podcast with Kris Boulton. Kris was acting as a salesman for Engelmann's Direct...